What this page is for
This page is for people who are interested in AI but also tired, busy or unsure where to start. Students revising on shared devices, parents trying to help, staff who want to use AI without feeling out of their depth.
AI for learning, not shortcuts
I care about AI as a quiet extra pair of hands. Something that helps students, parents and educators ask better questions, check understanding and break work into steps, not a way to dodge effort or replace people.
This page is for people who are interested in AI but also tired, busy or unsure where to start. Students revising on shared devices, parents trying to help, staff who want to use AI without feeling out of their depth.
These are the checks I carry in the back of my mind whenever I bring AI into learning work, whether at home or with organisations.
AI can suggest, nudge and explain, but decisions stay with humans. That includes deciding what to believe, what to ignore and when to ask for real life help.
A neat explanation that someone understands is better than a dazzling answer they cannot repeat in their own words. I aim for clarity, not impressive jargon.
AI can be wrong, biased or overconfident. I do not pretend it is neutral or magic. Built into everything I design is the assumption that answers need checking.
There is no point designing routines that only work with endless time, perfect wifi and one-to-one devices. I think about cramped spaces, shared logins and low energy.
Most of the routines I use follow a similar pattern. You can adapt this for students, parents or staff. It is meant to be flexible, not perfect.
I keep the same principles, but the way I talk about AI shifts depending on who I am working with.
Helping students use AI to practise, not to copy. We focus on questions, feedback and building independence, not perfect homework.
Supporting adults who want to help but feel rusty or unsure. AI becomes a shared helper, not something only the child understands.
Working with staff who want to bring AI into lessons or planning in a way that is realistic, ethical and aligned with policy.
These are the kinds of questions that come up in conversations with families, students and organisations. The answers are deliberately straightforward.
It depends how it is used. If AI is writing full answers and the student hands those in, that crosses a line. If AI is helping them understand a topic, practise questions or get feedback on their own work, it can be a form of support rather than cheating.
AI can be wrong, especially on niche or recent topics. I encourage people to treat AI as a first draft or a conversation partner, not a final source. We talk about checking against class notes, trusted websites or textbooks.
I suggest using tools that have clear safety settings and content filters, and I am open about the fact that nothing is perfect. For younger learners I prefer adults to be nearby, especially while habits are being formed.
No. It can lower some barriers by giving quick feedback or explanations, but it does not understand the full context of a learner’s life. I see it as an extra layer of support, not a replacement for real relationships.
I work with people who want AI to widen access, not widen gaps. That includes education teams, community groups and parents who want practical, honest support.
You can start with a simple message:
Tell me a little about your context and what you hope AI could help with, and we can go from there.